Please click to enlarge, script ordered in pages 1-4

Idea Two: Drinking
'Is teenage binge drinking spiraling out of control?'
The Facts:
Binge drinking is a significant problem among teenagers. Up to a quarter of 13 and 14-year-olds claimed to have "downed" at least five alcoholic drinks in a single session.
The figure rose to half of all 15 and 16-year-olds. The survey of 14,000 secondary school children across England, Scotland and Wales was carried out by Communities that Care for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Drinking amongst young teenagers is linked to anti-social behaviour and use of other drugs.
Among 15 to 16-year-olds, 27% reported three or more binges in the past month.
The survey also found 9% of boys and 5% of 11 and 12-year-old girls described themselves as regular drinkers, rising to 39% of boys and 33% of girls aged 15 to 16.
The majority of children said their parents would think it was wrong for them to steal or use illegal drugs. However the proportion who said their parents would object to under-age drinking declined from 91% of 11 to 12-year-olds to 56% of 15 to 16-year-olds.
The Investigation:
Things that could be included:
Idea Three: Miaow (Drugs)
'Should the legal high 'miaow' been made illegal in the UK?'
The Facts:
“Miaow” is sold as plant food on the internet where it is described as being not for human consumption.
It was made illegal in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Israel due to growing evidence of harm, including a reported possible cause of death.
Apart from the euphoria and alertness it is said to induce anxiety, paranoia and a risk of fits.
It is known as a “legal high” and its popularity is increasing sharply because it is legal to buy.
Police forces are aware of its existence, but because of its recent emergence onto the market are unsure of how widespread its use is.
The Investigation:
Things that could be included:
Notes:
Essay Question:
'Michael Moore documentaries have brought the genre into the mainstream and are inavative in their style. Discuss.'
The genre of Michael Moore’s documentaries is most often investigative and follows the same kind of format. He is always the narrator and the films rely on his voice over for additional information, he asks the audience questions followed up with his own opinions. The use of archive footage is always prominent in his documentaries and they are often heavily discussion based using interviews to portray two sides of an argument.
The investigative documentary is a genre that illustrates and investigates a real life subject using facts and archive footage to show the audience ‘first hand’ the point they are trying to make. Michael Moore’s investigative documentaries, like many others, attempt to discover the truth regarding political, medical and media issues.
I have seen three of Michael Moore’s documentaries; the first was Bowling for Columbine, a film about a school massacre and other acts of violence with guns. The film title comes from the story of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold – two students responsible for the Columbine High School massacre who attended a school bowling class before they committed a shooting attack at school.
In Moore’s documentary he engages in discussions with various people such as South Park creator Matt Stone, National Rifle Associations then-president Charlton Heston and musician Marilyn Manson as well as members of the school. He tries to find the truth behind why the Columbine massacre occurred and why the United States has such a high violent crime rate.
The second documentary I watch was Fahrenheit 9/11. The film takes a critical look at George Bush and the war on terrorism, and in particularly the coverage on American news.
This documentary again has a discussion-based theme with several conspiracy theories being argued. The documentary speaks to those who believe the American Government allowed or helped the attacks on the world trade centre and the pentagon. Michael Moore travels across the United States to investigate, speaking eye to eye with witnesses and tries to establish the truth.
The third and final documentary I watched was called Sicko. This documentary investigates the American heath care system, focusing on its health insurance and pharmaceutical industry. The investigation compares American to other countries who have non-profit universal health care systems such as the United Kingdom, Canada and France.
Bowling for columbine won numerous awards, including Academy Award for best documentary feature, the independent spirit award for best documentary feature and a special 55th anniversary prize at the Cannes film festival. Fahrenheit 9/11 was controversial but debuted at the 2004 Cannes film festival and received a 20-minute standing ovation (the longest in the festivals history). The film was also awarded with the Golden Palm, the festivals highest award. Sicko opened to positive reviews but also generated criticisms and controversy. Sicko made $24.5 million theatrically in the United States.
The fact that Michael Moore’s documentaries have done so well brings them into the mainstream. They have been acknowledging by many and so they become more popular. Documentary is not a popular genre but Michaels Moore’s have become an exception, as they are innovative in their style.
The documentaries are styled differently to many investigative types. Michael Moore uses humour to prove his point or opinion on subjects or people he does this using editing and manipulation of footage to work in favour of his opinion. Moore has often been criticised for appearing too much in his documentaries making the focus on him rather than the subject to be investigated. Although there are always two sides to each discussion he brings up, the editing of each discussion is quite biased, as it seems to always work in his favour. His use of archive footage is really effective. Many scenes of archive footage go on for quite a while, for instance the blank screen and the 911 calls in Fahrenheit 9/11 and the cctv footage and emergency calls played over the top in bowling for columbine. These scenes where unusually long but worked really effectively as they allowed emotional interaction between the situation and the audience. These scenes really prolonged the agony, helping us to engaged with the people who this affected. Michael Moore’s style is very innovative and this has made him more successful and more money, as innovation is the fundamental source of increasing wealth.